In a move that has sent shockwaves through Australian politics, former Northern Territory Chief Minister Adam Giles has dramatically severed ties with the Nationals, citing the party’s growing support for Pauline Hanson’s One Nation as the breaking point. But here’s where it gets controversial: Giles’s public endorsement of Hanson and her party didn’t just raise eyebrows—it sparked a formal demand for an explanation from the Nationals, exposing deep fractures within the Coalition. And this is the part most people miss: as One Nation’s influence continues to rise, it’s not just Giles who’s questioning the direction of the Nationals—it’s an entire faction within the party grappling with its identity and alliances.
For just $1 a week for the first 4 weeks (minimum cost $4), you can unlock this story and dive into a world of unlimited news, expert commentary, and exclusive insights. With full digital access, you’ll get:
- Unlimited access to our app and website, anytime, anywhere.
- A digital version of today’s paper, complete with liftouts and archives.
- Subscriber-exclusive newsletters and early access to tomorrow’s headlines.
- Complimentary access to The Wall Street Journal for a global perspective.
- Daily puzzles and Mind Games, including crosswords and Sudoku, to keep your mind sharp.
No lock-in contracts mean you’re in control. Or, lock in and save with our $8 weekly plan for the first 12 months (minimum cost $416), billed as $32 every 4 weeks, and continue at the same rate afterward. Be sure to read the fine print to understand all the details.
But here’s the real question: Is the Nationals’ alignment with One Nation a strategic shift or a risky gamble? Giles’s departure suggests the latter, but what do you think? Is this a principled stand or a political miscalculation? Let us know in the comments—this debate is far from over.
