In a move that has sparked intense debate and divided the community, former Syracuse school board member Twiggy Billue is refusing to go down without a fight, challenging her recent removal with a bold declaration: ‘We’re ready for the fight.’ But here’s where it gets controversial: was her attempt to intervene in her grandson’s education a justified act of care or a violation of board policies? Let’s dive in.
Published on January 24, 2026, by Emalyn Muzzy, this story unfolds in Syracuse, N.Y., where the school board unanimously voted to remove Billue less than a week ago. The decision came after an investigation alleged she breached school entry rules and sought to change her grandson’s teacher. Billue, who helps care for her elementary-age grandson, claims he has endured two years of bullying—a detail that adds a layer of emotional complexity to the case. Is this a matter of overstepping boundaries or a grandmother’s desperate attempt to protect her family?
At a Saturday news conference, Billue’s attorney, Doug Bullock, confirmed her plans to appeal the removal. ‘I still maintain no wrongdoing,’ Billue asserted, emphasizing her readiness to battle for her position. The appeal will be directed to New York State Education Commissioner Betty Rosa, who will review the evidence and decide whether to uphold the board’s decision. If Rosa sides with the district, Billue could escalate the matter to a judge—a process that could drag on for up to a year, according to Onondaga County Elections Commissioner Dustin Czarny.
And this is the part most people miss: the appeals process could significantly disrupt the typical election timeline. Normally, Syracuse citizens would vote for a replacement during the November general election, with candidates petitioning for ballot placement starting February 24. However, Billue’s potential reinstatement during the appeal could delay the election for her seat until 2027. Should the system prioritize procedural fairness or the urgency of filling a vacant board position?
Adding to the drama, over 25 supporters stood behind Billue at the news conference, including prominent figures like Syracuse Common Council Member Hanah Ehrenreich, who labeled the removal a ‘witch hunt.’ Ehrenreich argued that Billue’s actions were minor administrative infractions, not grounds for removal. Is this a fair assessment, or are there deeper issues at play?
Meanwhile, the school board’s handling of the situation has raised eyebrows. Members have remained tight-lipped, citing legal advice, and refused to release details of the charges until the removal hearing. Board President Tamica Barnett described the removal as ‘necessary,’ but many, including Mayor Sharon Owens, have expressed sadness over the situation. Was this a transparent and just process, or did the board overstep in their decision?
As the saga continues, Mayor Owens is obligated to appoint a temporary replacement for Billue, though she has yet to act, citing a need to understand the appeals process better. What does this mean for the board’s stability and the community’s trust in its leadership?
This case isn’t just about one board member’s fate—it’s a reflection of broader questions about accountability, family advocacy, and the limits of authority. Do you think Billue’s removal was justified, or is this a miscarriage of justice? Share your thoughts in the comments—this is a conversation that demands your voice.
